After Cleveland's home court-clinching win over the Pacers Monday night, LeBron James referred to a history of sport heart-breakers the city has seen. He called attention to "The Shot," Jordan's last-second shot in the opening round of the '89 playoffs, and Jose Mesa's 9th inning-breakdown in the '97 World Series.

It appears that LeBron knows his city's history.

You must applaud his commitment to Cleveland. Despite rumors of leaving for New York or a more successful city, LeBron continues to prove his love for a city that has loved him in return. This shows that even if he ever chooses to leave the Cavs, he will forever be associated with Cleveland's success.

In the same breath, Mike Piazza was a part the the New York Mets' closing of Shea Stadium and the opening celebration of Citi Field. I, and many of my generation, Piazza will forever be a Dodger. Though he did play one more year and hit more home runs in New York, his career, in my opinion, was highlighted by his six years with L.A.: New York has adopted him as their own.

These two individuals are just many who eventually embody the cities they play for. Piazza has retired yet continues his legacy by representing a team, LeBron continues to add to his growing association with Cleveland.

Think about this. Because of Brett Farve's single season in New York, all his career records were set as a Jet. Does this make him a New Yorker for life?  

You're turn. How important is it for a team and its host city to find an identifying player? Does this work with unsuccessful franchises?  Who are some of the future players that teams and cities will grow attached? How does the media impact this?